thin with disabilities
Would you still believe that a thin person who is disabled/physically disadvantaged from birth or a traumatic injury or has chronic pain is still more privileged than a fat person who has no disabilities or chronic pain?
Where do we draw the line between how much privilege somebody has or doesn’t have, and isn’t it unfair to assume all thin/thin-passing people are much more privileged than fat people simply by their size and not what you can or cannot physically see?
Mod response:
Go look up the concept of intersectionality, and come back either when you’re not playing gotcha, or when you can have a coherent and informed conversation. Because right now you’re full of shit one way or the other.
-MG
It sucks to be a thin disabled person because the world is not set up to accommodate disability well. But at least when I go get treatment for my disability, I can get healthcare without having to lose weight (or otherwise change lifestyle) first.
I may lack able-bodied privilege, but the intersection of disability and fat is much worse.
I’m fat and disabled. I have to pay twice as much for a wheelchair or crutches because cheaper ones are only designed for thin people. (Are thin people even aware that there is a max weight limit on all these things?) And the ones I can get are in the lovely color options of grey or beige.
I can’t find splints or braces for my dislocating joints because they don’t make them in my size in spite of the common narrative that being fat causes joint problems. If that’s true, surely there’s a huge waiting market for plus size splints and braces, yet I can’t find them.
If I use a wheelchair or mobility scooter or disabled seating people assume I’m just a lazy fatty and not really disabled. Or that being fat is my only disability (as if that’s a thing). I always have to measure how much abuse and side-eye I’m willing to endure before I use a mobility aid.
I could go on. Being disabled sucks for all disabled people. Being fat doesn’t somehow make it easier. And tbh, I get more abuse for being fat than I do for being disabled. Like, airlines have to accommodate my disability by law, but they can still abuse me and kick me off a flight for being fat.
I just don’t get why people are so set on this sense of trying to be the ultimate check mate. Why would you want to put these groups against each other? What purpose does it serve? We can care about more than one thing at a time, we can care about ableism, fatphobia and the intersection of these things. People are complicated and these type of questions are so often from a disingenous place.
We need to stop seeing dogwhistles everywhere. This could just as well have been a genuine question from an ignorant person looking for information FROM A POLITICAL BLOG (and thus a good place to ask for info from). This isn’t a rando bothering a personal blog with dumbass questions.
That being said, at this point we need to acknowledge that thin people also experience medical issues. Thin privilege absolutely exists, up to a point. Thin people failing to find adequate care because they’re underweight and thus deemed healthy, that’s a problem.
Socially, while women are usually advantaged when it comes to thinness, thin men are likely to struggle with body image issues when compared to their chubby counter parts (I mean chubby; at a higher scale the social dynamic shifts around). Virility equals mass. See the way we talk about “dad bods".
(now, this may be an issue with the definition of “fatness”, which ranges from overweight to obesity, and those in no way have the same impact)
I say this not to negate or erase social fatphobia. I am merely begging for nuance. Truthfully, this would be a good time to remember that, especially in the medical field, most people falling outside of the statistical “norm” will get underwhelming care (diverse degrees of underwhelming care depending on their weight, but this is. not. a. competition.)
As for the intersectionality OP is talking about: what they mean is that fat people have a deck of cards stacked against them. Or, say, imagine a D&D dice roll. Well, fat people will have additional social fragilities to defend against every single time, when compared to medium weight people or thin ones. And a fat person may be lucky enough to succeed in all of their dice rolls, and the other two may fail theirs; it doesn’t change that originally, they had the bigger DnD handicap pertaining to their weight.
Otherwise, here’s the wiki about intersectionality. It’s a start to dive deeper.
This blog has NEVER been a good place for people to get answers to questions like that. It wasn’t ever designed to be. @artetolife founded this blog as a safe space for fat people to talk about what it’s like to be fat, not to answer the questions of the clueless. There are places that exist for that purpose. This is not one. If you don’t like it, then move the fuck along.
I’m going to quote from our FAQ here:
This comes up quite a bit, so I’m going to stop and explain something.People send stuff in as suggestions, as concerns, as questions, as whatever, and some people are being sincere, but a lot of people who write in with the same thing and the same types of phrasing are being trolls, and go on to get nasty if we respond as if we’re sincere. We’ve been doing this for a while, and we know perfectly well what trolls sound like, and we don’t need any more nastiness in our inbox, because we already get a shitload. So when it sounds like a troll, we respond as if it is. And since most trolls reply to that with the hurt, “But I was just asking/commenting/whatever, why are you sooooo meeeeeeaaaaaan to meeeee?” we respond to that badly, too. And yeah, some of the people who respond that way are not trolls, but, again, we don’t have any way to know, and we don’t want to deal with the shit from trolls, we often just block them at that point, or continue to treat them as trolls. Because what’s the difference, practically speaking, between somebody intentionally trolling, and somebody who means it, but sounds exactly like a troll over several exchanges? They may feel differently, but they have the same effect on us either way.Now, this blog isn’t busy like it was when I wrote that originally. But I’m still fucking sick of dealing with this shit. I’m not going to stop being sick of dealing with it. And it continues to be not my job to do so on this blog, so I’m going to continue to not do so here.
Sometimes I do choose to educate someone I think is being sincere, both here and elsewhere. But it doesn’t matter whether this question is “sincere” or not, because the question itself is fucked up. There are lots of resources out there that are better suited to explaining to that person why it’s fucked up than I am, and they should go find one of those.
I think the simplest, non-aggressive answer I could give the OP is this:
Stop thinking about privilege in terms of “more” and “less”.
A person who is thin and disabled does not have more, or less, privilege-in-general than a fat able-bodied person, because privilege-in-general does not exist. What they have, instead, is a different privilege, and different challenges and disadvantages.
It’s not a contest. Don’t try to compare every societal advantage side by side, hoping to prove which one’s better, because real life doesn’t work like that. The existence of fat people and the fat positivity movement and fat activism takes nothing away from thin disabled people. We are not enemies.
Well said!


![scyphers:
“[ID tweet by Sofie Hagen @ SofieHagen: ‘Diets are a cure that don’t work for a disease that doesn’t exist’ was one of the slogans said by the first fat activism movements in the 60s. This is not new information.]
”](https://64.media.tumblr.com/159385c859463e7b5c5f823b78e25e4d/e0bb90cfae0e642d-5c/s1280x1920/bad0b439161e890d7bf66c03b4e0744299143542.jpg)